Return to
Home Page

Fowler Associates Investigates

The Safety of Irradiating the Mail




Steve Fowler was called to Washington by the congressional committee for oversight of the USPS. He discussed with them the use of radiation for the mail - its benefits and its drawbacks.

In 2001 the Postal Service ordered 8 Irradiation systems from Titan Scan (Surebeam). These systems were to provide up to 10 Mega ElectronVolt (MeV) electron beams or up to 7.5 MeV X-ray beams. The electron systems were to have a power level of 14 kW. The X-ray conversion systems have considerably less power in the delivered beam. These units were to be installed over the next year- 2002. The Postal Service asked for many more units in the near future. For now, the mail is being irradiated at a Titan Facility in Lima, Ohio and an IBA facility in Bridgeport, New Jersey. Both of these facilities are operating as very high MeV electron beam irradiation units.

We investigated if irradiation of the mail is safe? Of course this depends on what is meant by safe. It is like any other industrial process dealing with energy. Radiation is just energy. It has the same inherent dangers as any process- no more - no less. From the human standpoint (except for chemicals activated or changed by the radiation) , it is very safe. However, from the packaged product standpoint, there are some drawbacks with which we will have to live.

Some things to keep in mind about this process:
Pathogens will be killed
Electronics Probably will be Damaged
The terrorist mail threat will be eliminated
Biological Samples will be Damaged
The Mail will not become radioactive
Seeds will be Damaged
Plants will be Damaged
Photographic Film will be Damaged
Glassware & Jewelry May be Changed
Magnetic Media May be Changed
Costs of Postage will Increase
Possible chemical hazards from the mail contents for postal workers

In other words the use of radiation to sanitize the mail is justified from a safety standpoint but does come with some adjustments to our concepts of the postal system. If the total mail volume is irradiated or if the mail is randomly irradiated, the products which may be damaged will no longer be able to be shipped by standard mail.

It is our opinion that the sanitizing of the mail needs to be from a systems approach using many methods of pathogen elimination. Some suggestions have been ETO gas such as now used in medical sterilization. Also Chlorine dioxide may be used. Some have suggested Ozone. The problem is that we do not have a good understanding of the lethal dose for Anthrax spores for these gases. More work needs to be done in this area. Our attempts to get such information was unsuccessful. We were told by the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta that this was the responsibility of the EPA. Calls to the EPA have not yielded any useful information as of this time.

We are sure that radiation doses of 15 to 25 kiloGrays (1.5 - 2.5 MegaRads) will kill most of the spores. A study by the Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research in Salisbury, Wilkshire, UK suggests doses as high as 41 kGy may be required for sterilization. The good news about this is that almost any well designed system will eliminate the threat to a very workable level. It will make the effort by terrorists not justified and therefore be very successful.

The mail should be collected differently, sorted differently and have sanitizing methods applied for the level of distribution. There were no deaths from Anthrax in the offices of the News personnel or Senators who received the letters. The only deaths outside of the 1st death at AMI in Florida (Bob Stevens) were among postal workers and possibly associates. This means if we now know of the threat and handle the mail with some caution, the receiving party of a letter containing a pathogen may be able to be contained and treated. However, those who handle the letter are at risk due to the volume of mail and the lack of knowledge about each piece. What this should mean is that the mail must be sanitized and contained as early in the collection process as possible. While we need massive radiation facilities for the accumulated volume of mail in central areas, we must not neglect the need for sanitizing the mail near the collection point. This is true whether the mail is collected on a street, in an urban area or from a rural mailbox. The mail needs to have some measure of control of the release of spores or other pathogens while it is being collected and handled early in the system.

The use of plastic bags would help contain and segregate the mail.
The use of smaller radiation systems may be more economic to place nearer the collection point.
The use of other methods such as gases in the shipping process may be economically justified.

Electron Beam Radiation Systems

Electron beams use the same electrons which we use everyday for electricity. The main difference is that the electrons are traveling at relativistic speeds (near the speed of light) and are free to travel in the air after exiting the electron beam accelerator titanium window. These electrons give up their energy by ionizing the materials within their range. The distance (range) an electron will travel is shown in the following depth dose curves. These curves are for water which is 1 gm/cc density. Anything else that is irradiated by these electrons would have a proportional range. If the material is less dense such as paper, the electrons would travel further. If the material is more dense the electrons would not travel as far. In fact, their range in any material can be ratioed to the density of water. Paper has a lower density than water. Some sheets of paper may have densities of 0.7 gm/cc. However, a book's density could fall to 0.5 gm/cc with the interpage air gaps. Envelopes may have very low densities allowing the electron beam to penetrate several inches of letters depending on the energy level of the electron beam.

One of the problems with electron beams and its effects on materials is that when the beam is stopped in an insulating material such as a polymer, the electrons become "Static Electricity." Electrons which are not moving are "static." This means that very large static fields may develop in materials which may cause undesired changes to the material. It is common for plastics subjected to electron beam which have a range shorter than the thickness of the plastic to be damaged by discharges of the static charges. This damage may be seen as holes or fractures. These fractures are called Lichtenberg trees (or frozen lightning) and can be quite beautiful. Of course this is a problem for electronic circuits.





X-ray Radiation Systems

X-rays are produced when high energy electrons are stopped abruptly in a dense material such as Tungsten, lead or Gold. X-rays penetrate much greater distances than electrons. This means they give up less of their energy in the product. Therefore the doses needed to kill pathogens will take longer than in an electron beam system. X-rays by their greater penetration allow more dense products to be irradiated such as catalogues and large boxes or bags of mail. The production of X-rays is very inefficient. At 1 MeV electrons, the production may yield only a percent or so of useful X-rays. At 10 MeV the yield may be as high as 10%. This means for a 100 kW electron beam system converting its output to X-rays, the power of the X-rays will be between 1 and 10 kW. If the system has 10 kW output the X-rays would be between 100 Watts and 1000 Watts.

Gamma-ray Radiation Systems

Gamma rays are very simiar to X-rays in their penetrating ability. They are both electromagnetic energy as opposed to the electron which is an energetic partical. Gamma rays come from radioactive isotopes such as Cobalt-60 and Cesium-137. Cobalt-60 produces gamma rays which have an energy of about 1.25 MeV where Cesium-137 has rays with about 660 keV energy. The Titan and IBA systems can produce X-rays much more energetic than these two isotopes. Cobalt-60 and Cesium-137 are radioactive and can not be turned off. They must always be shielded. X-ray machines as well as electron accelerators are not a radiation source when their power is off.

Cobalt-60 has a half-life of about 5 years. Cesium has a half-life of about 30 years. this means that after every half-life period the original activity of the source has been reduced by one half. This is a drawback for the economics of isotopes as sanitizing units. Some large gamma radiation systems have as many as 3.5 Mega Curies of Cobalt-60. In order to keep the source at strength the facility must replace about 1/3rd of the material each year at a cost of well over $1Million.

Also, the Postal Service must consider that the large proliferation of gamma sources might make attactive targets for terriorists to spread a "dirty" bomb.

The calculation of the dose need for sanitizing the mail may be made from the following relationships:

1 Gray (1 Gy) = 1 Joule/kg ----------- 25 kGy = 25E3 J/kg
kWatts X 3.6E6 = Joules/hr

a 100 kW system would present 3.6E8 J/hr.

at 25 kGy this would sanitize 14,400 kg/hr

a 1 kW system would present 3.6E6 J/hr.
at 25 kGy this would sanitize 144 kg/hr

Of course these are maximums.

There are many entrepreneurs who have begun to advertise solutions to the mail issue. These range from desk top irradiators to herbal potions. The congressional committee also asked us to look into these claims. We found none viable and most laughable.We recommend that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Beware.


Radiation Safety

Radiation Safety is an important issue for the installation of these proposed systems. Most states require that a Radiation Safety Officer be on staff for each facility. These persons must have knowledge and experience with radiation safety. They typically must attend radiation safety training courses which are specific to the use of electron beams and X-rays for industrial uses. These systems are capable of being operated with little or no safety issues. In fact some users of electron beam systems have now operated almost 50 years with no safety problems.